Your Power BI migration is finished. Are people actually using the new reports?

You have moved reports to Power BI from a legacy platform, or from one Power BI tenant to another. The cutover is done, the acceptance tests passed, and the project is technically complete.

Then the questions start. Did people actually switch? Which of the migrated reports are being used, and which ones did everyone quietly abandon? Your sponsor wants evidence that the investment paid off, and the next migration wave is waiting on your answer.

Why a finished migration can still fail quietly

A successful migration is usually measured by whether reports were delivered, not by whether anyone uses them. Delivery is easy to count, and adoption is much harder to measure.

From native usage metrics you learn that a report was opened, within a limited window of history. That is enough to see a page view, but not enough to tell a real switch from a single curious click, or to show that people open the new report and then go back to the spreadsheet they trust.

Source: Microsoft: Power BI migration overview

What adoption looks like after the cutover

BI Pixie adds Pixies, invisible tracking pixels native to Power BI, to your migrated reports, so you can measure the switch rather than assume it.

A User Adoption dashboard page showing total users, daily and monthly active users, the DAU over MAU stickiness ratio, a monthly adoption trend that separates passive users, and a Users by Report bar chart
Users per report after the cutover, with the monthly active trend beside it, so you can see whether the new reports picked up an audience.
Adoption and attrition per report
BI Pixie shows monthly active users and how that population grows or shrinks after go-live, so you can see a report that launched well and then lost its audience.
Depth, not just opens
BI Pixie uses session duration and interactions per session to separate people who genuinely work in a report from those who open it and leave.
Which pages and visuals are still used after the migration
BI Pixie shows, down to the page and visual, which parts of a migrated report people still open, and which were rebuilt for nobody.
Satisfaction from the people using the report
BI Pixie collects satisfaction scores through feedback controls and embedded surveys inside the report, so post-migration sentiment comes from your users rather than from the loudest stakeholder.
Report speed before and after the cutover
In BI Pixie on Azure, the self-hosted edition you deploy into your own Azure subscription, BI Pixie measures load and render times per report and per visual. "It has been slower since the migration" is the hardest complaint to answer, because by the time it is raised the old platform is gone and nobody measured it. A baseline captured before the cutover turns that into a specific report, page, or visual you can point at. Comparing report speed needs your Power BI workspaces integrated with Azure Log Analytics, and the integration must be in place before you migrate, or there is no baseline to compare against.

Migrating the data platform underneath the reports

The harder version of this problem starts before anything is rebuilt. You are moving the data estate itself to Microsoft Fabric, Databricks, or Snowflake, and hundreds of existing Power BI reports point at the platform you are retiring. Every one of them needs a decision, and the decision is not technical.

Effort is the easy half to estimate. Any competent team can look at a report and say whether it needs a new connection string or a rebuild. The half nobody can answer from the report itself is whether it is worth the work. So teams migrate everything, which is the most expensive option available, or they cut by guesswork and find out which reports mattered when someone escalates.

Repoint it and leave it alone
A report with steady monthly users and real interaction depth is working. Change the connection, change nothing else, and protect it through the cutover.
Refactor it
When heavy use is concentrated in two pages out of eleven, you know what to keep and what to drop. With page and visual level engagement, a rewrite becomes a scope decision instead of a rebuild of everything that was there before.
Rebuild it
High opens with almost no interaction, or a report people open and leave within seconds, usually means the report is being tolerated rather than used. That is a candidate to redesign on the new platform, not to carry across as-is.
Retire it
Reports opened by a handful of people a few times a quarter are the cheapest win in any migration. Retiring them removes migration effort, support load, and a data source dependency in one decision.

BI Pixie does not estimate migration effort. In BI Pixie on Azure, the self-hosted edition, BI Pixie maps your workspaces, semantic models, and dataflows to their underlying connectors, so you can filter to the reports that depend on the platform you are retiring, and it shows you which of those reports justify the work.

What it takes to set up

  1. 1 Connect your Power BI workspace and select the migrated reports.
  2. 2 Add Pixies. The tracking is invisible to your users.
  3. 3 Let a normal reporting cycle run so you have a baseline to compare against.
  4. 4 Review adoption and engagement per report in the BI Pixie Dashboard.

Worth knowing: Baselines start when you add Pixies, so add Pixies to the migrated reports as early as you can. If you can add them before go-live, you get a genuine before-and-after rather than an after-only picture. Adoption is measured from engagement counts, not from personal data: nothing personally identifying is collected unless you enable user identity capture in tracking setup, and that setting is off by default.

See the data from your own reports

Add Pixies to a report and watch real interaction data arrive. BI Pixie starts free, and no credit card is needed.